As in the case of genderised and racial patterns of behaviour, the answers to such questions probably lie in the nature of society itself, which is normally monolithic and bound by social inertia, and is thus resistant to most forms of non-revolutionary change. Today architectural education finds itself in a similar quandary: nearly fifty years after Amos Rapoport published his seminal work House Form and Culture (1969), South African schools of architecture are still graduating students who, contrary to all they have been taught, continue to follow modernist patterns of architectural practice, unencumbered by thoughts of cultural colonialism, environmental degradation, globalization and historical context. Since 1994 it has also become obvious that these changes could not be legislated into being. (Thomas, 2001, p 121-140) Concerns of a similar nature were also voiced by Hassan Howa in the 1970s when he stated that there could be “no normal sport in an abnormal society” (Black & Nauright, 1998, p 73), and that such changes would not become possible without a radical reconfiguration of South African society taking place. Furthermore, many mothers worry that their feminine/feminist sons may find themselves misfits in a patriarchal society. The task of raising a new “generation of men” is seldom supported by fathers or the world at large. More recently a number of feminist researchers have commented on the fact that: The work of raising anti-sexist sons has proven to be more difficult and daunting than the task of rearing feminist daughters. Since the 1970s, for example, a number of feminist authors have questioned whether feminist mothers were capable of raising gender-liberated sons in a society that remained essentially patriarchal in nature (Dworkin, 1978). As a result we now use periods of transition as an acceptable means of minimizing the impact of change When dealing with the collateral issues of change, disciplines from divergent backgrounds often find that they share in a number of commonalities. Despite the fact that many changes are not revolutionary in nature, but are merely the result of an evolution of ideas whose time has come, acceptance is seldom immediate, it is usually slow, and is commonly preceded by anxiety and even violence. Whether it is brought about by the introduction of new ideas, new practices, or new technologies, the need to meet changing social or environmental conditions is constantly with us and, it may be argued, is as inescapable as death and taxes. Keating’s criticism of the record-keeping by some bishops underlines the obstacles that the review board faces as it begins its work.Change and the inevitability of change is one of the givens of human society, yet it remains one of the most difficult and most painful processes known to us. “How much of that is the result of the passing of time or ignorance and neglect, and how much of it is a conspiracy of silence, remains to be seen,” Keating said in an interview here. In this early step in producing a nationwide study outlining the scope of the crisis, the board has found some records “inadequate,” Keating said. Frank Keating of Oklahoma, who leads the National Review Board established by the bishops in June to monitor their response to the abuse crisis, said his group had contacted some of the nation’s 194 dioceses to assess their files on abuse. OKLAHOMA CITY – The chairman of a church panel studying the sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church said that obtaining an accurate accounting of all priests and children involved would be a challenge because some church officials had been “slovenly to the point of reckless” in their record keeping. Baltimore Sun eNewspaper Home Page Close Menu
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |